<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><vmp:chapter id="gone" xmlns:vmp="http://www.hoise.com/vmp/manual/1.0">    <vmp:title>Systems disappeared from the list</vmp:title><p>As already stated in the introduction the list of systems is notcomplete. On one hand this is caused by the sheer number of systemsthat are presented to the market and are often very similar tosystems described above (for instance, the Volvox system not listedis very similar but not equivalent to the listed C-DAC system andthere are numerous other examples). On the other hand there manysystems that are still in operation around the world, often inconsiderable quantities that for other reasons are excluded. Themost important reasons are:</p><ul><li>The system is not marketed anymore. This is generally for oneof two reasons: <ul><li>The manufacturer is out of business.</li><li>The manufacturer has replaced the system by a newer model ofthe same type or even of a different type.</li></ul></li><li>The system has become technologically obsolete in comparison toothers of the same type. Therefore, listing them is not sensibleanymore.</li></ul><p>Below we present a table of systems that fall into one of thecategories mentioned above. We think this may have some sense tothose who come across machines that are still around but are notthe latest in their fields. It may be interesting at least to havean indication how such systems compare to the newest ones and toplace them in context. </p><p>It is good to realise that although systems have disappearedfrom the section above they still may exist and are actually sold.However, their removal stems in such cases mainly from the factthat they are not serious candidates for high-performance computinganymore.</p><p>The table is, again, not complete and admittedly somewhatarbitrary. The data are in a highly condensed form: the systemname, system type, theoretical maximum performance of a fullyconfigured system, and the reason for their disappearance is given.The arbitrariness lies partly in the decision which systems arestill sufficiently of interest to include and which are not.</p><p>We include the year of introduction and theyear of exit of the systems when they were readily accessible.These timespans could give a hint of the dynamics that governs thisvery dynamical branch of the the computer industry.</p>&exit-systems; </vmp:chapter>